RGH Error 204 - reading block

[wojtech.nettle]

TX Product(s) used: J-R Programmer
Console Type: Jasper
NAND size: 16
Dashboard version: 2.0.13599
CB version: 6750
Screenshot of NAND details from J-Runner:

J-Runner log:

Checking Files
Finished Checking Files
Checking Console..
Version: 01
Flash Config: 0x00023010
00023010
Trinity, Jasper 16MB
CB Version: 6750
Jasper 16MB
Version: 01
Flash Config: 0x00023010
00023010
Trinity, Jasper 16MB
CB Version: 6750
Jasper 16MB
Reading Nand to C:\Users\Vojczek\Downloads\J-Runner v03 (1) Core Pack\J-Runner\output\nanddump1.bin
Reading Nand
Error: 204 reading block EB
Done!
in 3:20 min:sec


Reading Nand to C:\Users\Vojczek\Downloads\J-Runner v03 (1) Core Pack\J-Runner\output\nanddump2.bin
Initializing nanddump1.bin..
Jasper 16MB
Reading Nand
RGH Selected
Nand Initialization Finished
Error: 204 reading block EB
Done!
in 3:20 min:sec


Reading Nand to C:\Users\Vojczek\Downloads\J-Runner v03 (1) Core Pack\J-Runner\output\nanddump3.bin
Comparing...
Nands are the same
Reading Nand
Error: 204 reading block EB
Done!
in 3:20 min:sec


Reading Nand to C:\Users\Vojczek\Downloads\J-Runner v03 (1) Core Pack\J-Runner\output\nanddump4.bin
Comparing...
Nands are the same
Reading Nand
Error: 204 reading block EB
Done!
in 3:20 min:sec


Comparing...
Nands are the same

Description of problem:

I still get error 204 when reading NAND. I have experience only with error 250 and j-runner it always remapped. Now j-runner shows no bad blocks and bad block dont remap. I would like to ask if I can continue? Thanks

Was the console working before you started: Y

 

[john mathews]

yes its getting remapped u get bad blocks

 

[Martin C]

yes its getting remapped u get bad blocks

No it's not. Do you see anywhere that the block was found anywhere else? No.

Understand there's a difference between a remapped block and a bad block. In this case, the OP should still be ok as the NANDs match.

 

[wojtech.nettle]

Everything went well. RGH is complete. Thanks.

 

[Martin C]

hmmm

There's absolutely no reason for you posting this.