ANSWERED Is this version of jtag alt ok?

[A.D.I.D.A.S]

Hello,
I looked for this answer and found one but didn't understand. I messed up my jtag alt v2 so I got a version 1 that does not have the AUD_Clamp point. Is the an alternative option for AUD_Clamp?

Hard to see but the trace is pulled and making contact with the other points.

Thank you for any help one can give.


Sent from my XT912 using Tapatalk 2

 

[BL4K3Y]

Re: Is this version of jtag although ok?

Which pad/trace is lifted?

 

[scott1503]

Re: Is this version of jtag although ok?

You could always use the old jtag method

 

[A.D.I.D.A.S]

Re: Is this version of jtag although ok?

The trace going to the top left pad, hard to see but it is exposed and not sure if it will cause issues after soldered down.

 

[A.D.I.D.A.S]

Re: Is this version of jtag although ok?

You could always use the old jtag method

Not familiar with the old jtag method. Will have to look that up.

 

[TheGlow]

This should help. Ehh, top pic shows the bottom, bottom pic shows top of the board.
It should give you an idea.

 

[A.D.I.D.A.S]

just one last question on this, If I do this I still install the other boards that came with the RGH? Will this be considered a Jtag and not and RGH? Sorry just making sure.

 

[acs420]

yes you still solder the post qsb and r-jtag chip and there you have it a r-jtag not rgh

 

[A.D.I.D.A.S]

yes you still solder the post qsb and r-jtag chip and there you have it a r-jtag not rgh

Great, thank you!